engineering-workflows
The everyday loop — find the cause, agree the design, write the plan, run it.
At a glance
- 6 skills · 1 agent
- No credentials, accounts or external CLIs
- Claude Code only — it needs a shell and a checkout
Install
/plugin marketplace add https://catylai.com/marketplace.json/plugin install engineering-workflows@catylai
Six skills and one agent, covering the week between "something is wrong" and "it shipped".
root-cause runs a debugging session as a loop rather than a guess: symptoms
first, then falsifiable hypotheses tested against evidence. The heavy reading is
delegated to the debugger agent, which is read-only — it never edits and
never runs a mutating command, so the diagnosis comes back to the main thread
where the full test output is visible and the fix can actually be verified.
design-intake classifies the work before anyone writes code — a spike, a
bounded change, or something architectural — and the ceremony scales with that
answer while the approval gate before implementation does not. writing-plans
turns an approved design into a plan someone else can execute: a pointer back to
the spec, the constraints reproduced verbatim so a per-task dispatch carries
them, and per-task file and interface blocks.
release-train runs a large change as one leader supervising several workers,
each in its own git worktree, converging on a shared release branch. It reads
the file blocks from a plan to prove the bundles are genuinely disjoint before
any worker starts, because two workers editing one file is the failure the whole
structure exists to prevent.
repo-walkthrough orients you in an unfamiliar codebase to the point of being
able to contribute safely. handoff writes the note a fresh session can resume
from — including what was already tried and ruled out, which is the part that
stops the next session repeating the last one.
Everything here needs a real checkout and a shell, and the debugger agent is a
subagent, so this plugin is Claude Code only.
If you want the full review pipeline — deterministic detectors, judgement agents
and a validator that owns the verdict — that is code-review-core. If you want
the Claude Code authoring rules those agents are written against, that is
claude-craft.